 |
 |
Submit Benchmarks!
Radeon HD 5870 vs Radeon HD 6870
Intro
The Radeon HD 5870 comes with a core clock speed of 850 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1200 MHz. It also uses a 256-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is made up of 1600(320x5) SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.Compare that to the Radeon HD 6870, which uses a 40 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 900 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1050 MHz on this particular model. It features 1120 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 6870 |
|
151 Watts |
| Radeon HD 5870 |
|
188 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Theoretically, the Radeon HD 5870 should be a small bit faster than the Radeon HD 6870 in general. (explain)
| Radeon HD 5870 |
|
153600 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 6870 |
|
134400 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon HD 5870 will be a lot (approximately 35%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 6870. (explain)| Radeon HD 5870 |
|
68000 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 6870 |
|
50400 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The Radeon HD 6870 is a bit (about 6%) better at FSAA than the Radeon HD 5870, and also should be capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)| Radeon HD 6870 |
|
28800 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 5870 |
|
27200 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Radeon HD 5870Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6870Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 5870 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Year | September 23, 2009 | October 2010 |
| Code Name | Cypress XT | Barts XT |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 1024 MB |
| Core Speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 188 watts | 151 watts |
| Bandwidth | 153600 MB/sec | 134400 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 68000 Mtexels/sec | 50400 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 27200 Mpixels/sec | 28800 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 1600(320x5) | 1120 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 80 | 56 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 2154 million | 1700 million |
| Bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCIe x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.2 | OpenGL 4.1 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.
Radeon HD 5870Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6870Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Comments
5 Responses to “Radeon HD 5870 vs Radeon HD 6870”[...] [...]
[...] Here is a theoretical comparison, that has always seemed pretty close to real world performance. Radeon HD 5870 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare If you can wait till this evening, we do have some real experts, and you won't be disappointed. [...]
[...] Posted by Lemon hahahaha that's a 5870 loser Idiot, see this: Radeon HD 5870 vs Radeon HD 6870 ***8211; Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare 5870 is better than 6870, I think it may be better than all but the 6900 series [...]
[...] more efficient in terms of power consumption compared to a 5870 (unless I've overlooked something) Radeon HD 5870 vs Radeon HD 6870 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare Definitely will be aiming for a used card, hopefully some fellow Canucks will sell their cards to [...]
Real world shows the 6870 will deliver better performance over its sibling at high res': http://www.techspot.com/review/325-amd-radeon-6870/page8.html