GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 260X, which has core clock speeds of 1100 MHz on the GPU, and 1625 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 750 Ti		4562 points
Radeon R7 260X		4381 points
	Difference: 181 (4%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R7 260X		95 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		72 Sol/s
	Difference: 23 (32%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti		60 Watts
Radeon R7 260X		115 Watts
	Difference: 55 Watts (92%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R7 260X should theoretically be just a bit better than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X		104000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 17600 (20%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X should be a lot (more or less 51%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X		61600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		40800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 20800 (51%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X is just a bit (about 8%) more effective at AA than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X		17600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		16320 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 1280 (8%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.