Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X
IntroThe GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a core clock speed of 1020 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1350 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 640 SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 260X, which has clock speeds of 1100 MHz on the GPU, and 1625 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Zcash Mining Hash Rate
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthTheoretically, the Radeon R7 260X should be a little bit faster than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in general. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon R7 260X will be quite a bit (approximately 51%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)
Pixel RateIf running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon R7 260X is the winner, though only just barely. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
9 Responses to “GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X”The 260X should be killing the 750 Ti in benchmarks. You can clearly see it has more horsepower. A higher Texel Rate Higher Pixel Rate and Higher Memory Bandwidth. But thanks to AMD's Drivers, LOL, The R7 265 does kill the 750 Ti and is the same price. But the R7 265 could be much faster in benchmarks too if AMD could get get someone who could actually make drivers. What AMD needs to do is just scrap all drivers they have and start with new code. That is the only way they are ever going to fix their driver issues. And they need to fire whoever the idiots are that are constantly making the decision to keep putting out drivers with the same problems they have had for years over and over again!
You're right blair. I think that's the main reason they're starting with the mantle thing to begin with. I know that's more like a second layer and not the drive but the performarce is clearly's better now. Hope this works out for AMD.
It is only instatant compare based on technical specifications. In reality HW of GTX is more powerfull, better and faster than R7. Power consuption in this price level graphics cards is importatnt too. Sorry for my bad English. Do you understand I want to tell you?
the R7 260X destroys the 750 TI but it uses twice the wattage which makes it not really worth it considering it's not that much more powerful than the TI
You have the 750ti only supporting DirectX 11 when it actually supports DirectX 11.2 like you have listed for the 260X.
could I run the 260X on a 500w psu?
Yes Daniel the 260X has a 500w requirement. The gtx 750ti needs only 400w. But wattage isnt the most important part. The 260x need 30-33 amps on 12V rail, while the gtx only 20 amps. Check ur psu. (I bought the gtx 750ti, and had to replace my 400w psu which had only 15 amps, with another with 30 amps on 12V)(corsair CX430)
James says: my poweer supply unit says: 12v 17 Amp 12v1 14 Amp.
Is this enougth? for 750 Ti ?
Actually own a HD 5770 and plays great 😀
i have both of them r7 260x have more sound but in red dead redemption i got 29 fps in low
but 750ti is silent cooler but i got 25 fps in red dead 2 now i have gigabyte gtx 970 windforce
its a killer o advice for someone want to have low budget system