Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X


The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has clock speeds of 1020 MHz on the GPU, and 1350 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 640 SPUs as well as 40 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 260X, which has a clock speed of 1100 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1625 MHz. It also features a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs


These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4562 points
Radeon R7 260X 4381 points
Difference: 181 (4%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R7 260X 95 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 72 Sol/s
Difference: 23 (32%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 60 Watts
Radeon R7 260X 115 Watts
Difference: 55 Watts (92%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R7 260X should perform a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in general. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X 104000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 86400 MB/sec
Difference: 17600 (20%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X will be much (about 51%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X 61600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 40800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 20800 (51%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X should be just a bit (about 8%) faster with regards to AA than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and also will be able to handle higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X 17600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 16320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1280 (8%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 260X

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon R7 260X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2014 October 2013
Code Name GM107 Bonaire XTX
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1020 MHz 1100 MHz
Memory Speed 5400 MHz 6500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 115 watts
Bandwidth 86400 MB/sec 104000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 40800 Mtexels/sec 61600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16320 Mpixels/sec 17600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 640 896
Texture Mapping Units 40 56
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1870 million 2080 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.4 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 260X

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


9 Responses to “GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X”
Blair says:

The 260X should be killing the 750 Ti in benchmarks. You can clearly see it has more horsepower. A higher Texel Rate Higher Pixel Rate and Higher Memory Bandwidth. But thanks to AMD's Drivers, LOL, The R7 265 does kill the 750 Ti and is the same price. But the R7 265 could be much faster in benchmarks too if AMD could get get someone who could actually make drivers. What AMD needs to do is just scrap all drivers they have and start with new code. That is the only way they are ever going to fix their driver issues. And they need to fire whoever the idiots are that are constantly making the decision to keep putting out drivers with the same problems they have had for years over and over again!

Jhon says:

You're right blair. I think that's the main reason they're starting with the mantle thing to begin with. I know that's more like a second layer and not the drive but the performarce is clearly's better now. Hope this works out for AMD.

John from CZ says:

It is only instatant compare based on technical specifications. In reality HW of GTX is more powerfull, better and faster than R7. Power consuption in this price level graphics cards is importatnt too. Sorry for my bad English. Do you understand I want to tell you?

clark says:

the R7 260X destroys the 750 TI but it uses twice the wattage which makes it not really worth it considering it's not that much more powerful than the TI

Camdex says:

You have the 750ti only supporting DirectX 11 when it actually supports DirectX 11.2 like you have listed for the 260X.

Daniel says:

could I run the 260X on a 500w psu?

James says:

Yes Daniel the 260X has a 500w requirement. The gtx 750ti needs only 400w. But wattage isnt the most important part. The 260x need 30-33 amps on 12V rail, while the gtx only 20 amps. Check ur psu. (I bought the gtx 750ti, and had to replace my 400w psu which had only 15 amps, with another with 30 amps on 12V)(corsair CX430)

elbeto57 says:

James says: my poweer supply unit says: 12v 17 Amp 12v1 14 Amp.

Is this enougth? for 750 Ti ?

Actually own a HD 5770 and plays great 😀

javad says:

i have both of them r7 260x have more sound but in red dead redemption i got 29 fps in low
but 750ti is silent cooler but i got 25 fps in red dead 2 now i have gigabyte gtx 970 windforce
its a killer o advice for someone want to have low budget system

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield