Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

A Question

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 660 vs Geforce GTX 760

Intro

The GeForce GTX 660 uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 980 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1502 MHz on this specific model. It features 960 SPUs as well as 80 Texture Address Units and 24 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Geforce GTX 760, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 980 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a speed of 1502 MHz on this card. It features 1152 SPUs as well as 96 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 660 140 Watts
Geforce GTX 760 170 Watts
Difference: 30 Watts (21%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Geforce GTX 760 should perform much faster than the GeForce GTX 660 overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 192256 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 660 144192 MB/sec
Difference: 48064 (33%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 should be a little bit (approximately 20%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 660. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 94080 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 660 78400 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 15680 (20%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the Geforce GTX 760 is superior to the GeForce GTX 660, by a large margin. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 31360 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 660 23520 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7840 (33%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 660

Amazon.com

Geforce GTX 760

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 660 Geforce GTX 760
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year September 2012 June 2013
Code Name GK106 GK104
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 980 MHz 980 MHz
Shader Speed 980 MHz 980 MHz
Memory Speed 6008 MHz 6008 MHz
Unified Shaders 960 1152
Texture Mapping Units 80 96
Render Output Units 24 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 192-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 140 watts 170 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 144192 MB/sec 192256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 78400 Mtexels/sec 94080 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 23520 Mpixels/sec 31360 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

8 Responses to “GeForce GTX 660 vs Geforce GTX 760”
Schaumstoff says:

The gtx 760 is a lot more expensive but I think it is worth it.

Dat guy says:

At current UK prices the 760 is around 30 pounds more expensive than the 660 and I'd be happy to spend that much for the performance gain.

Jessy says:

I shouldv'e gotten this 760. But at the time, I just needed a new GPU when mine was a 610... -_- But I do intend to get a new one soon so we'll see. :)

Raj says:

Anybody thinking that 760 will give a performance edge enough to justify the price difference certainly does not knows anything about Graphic Cards

@Raj says:

I think that you don't know anything about graphics cards

KHAWAR ZAMAN says:

192bit can not run more games in 1080p setting. lol

Deus says:

Khawar, you're wrong, the bitrate doesn't influence the resolution as much as the available memory on the card. IE. 192bit 3GB card will render 1080 fine, a 265 1GB card will struggle(example only).

damian says:

i have a gtx 760 a i3 3220 and 6 gb of ram and i can run bf4 maxed

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]