Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 660 vs Geforce GTX 760

Intro

The GeForce GTX 660 has core speeds of 980 MHz on the GPU, and 1502 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 960 SPUs as well as 80 Texture Address Units and 24 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Geforce GTX 760, which uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 980 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a frequency of 1502 MHz on this model. It features 1152 SPUs along with 96 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 660 140 Watts
Geforce GTX 760 170 Watts
Difference: 30 Watts (21%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Geforce GTX 760, in theory, should perform much faster than the GeForce GTX 660 overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 192256 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 660 144192 MB/sec
Difference: 48064 (33%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 is a bit (about 20%) more effective at AF than the GeForce GTX 660. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 94080 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 660 78400 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 15680 (20%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the Geforce GTX 760 is the winner, and very much so. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 31360 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 660 23520 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7840 (33%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 660

Amazon.com

Geforce GTX 760

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 660 Geforce GTX 760
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year September 2012 June 2013
Code Name GK106 GK104
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 980 MHz 980 MHz
Shader Speed 980 MHz 980 MHz
Memory Speed 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 960 1152
Texture Mapping Units 80 96
Render Output Units 24 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 192-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 140 watts 170 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 144192 MB/sec 192256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 78400 Mtexels/sec 94080 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 23520 Mpixels/sec 31360 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

4 Responses to “GeForce GTX 660 vs Geforce GTX 760”
Schaumstoff says:
The gtx 760 is a lot more expensive but I think it is worth it.
Dat guy says:
At current UK prices the 760 is around 30 pounds more expensive than the 660 and I'd be happy to spend that much for the performance gain.
Jessy says:
I shouldv'e gotten this 760. But at the time, I just needed a new GPU when mine was a 610... -_- But I do intend to get a new one soon so we'll see. :)
Raj says:
Anybody thinking that 760 will give a performance edge enough to justify the price difference certainly does not knows anything about Graphic Cards

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree