Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 570 vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB

Intro

The GeForce GTX 570 has core clock speeds of 732 MHz on the GPU, and 950 MHz on the 1280 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 480 SPUs as well as 60 Texture Address Units and 40 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 6950 2GB, which makes use of a 40 nm design. ATi has clocked the core speed at 800 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a frequency of 1250 MHz on this particular model. It features 1408 SPUs along with 88 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Settings: Highest Settings
AA: 4x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Intel Core i7 920(ES) @ 4.0Ghz (Turbo Mode Enabled) (Source)
GeForce GTX 570 59 FPS
Radeon HD 6950 2GB 51 FPS
Difference: 8 FPS (16%)

DiRT 2

Settings: Highest Details
AA: 4x
AF: none
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Intel Core i7 920(ES) @ 4.0Ghz (Turbo Mode Enabled) (Source)
GeForce GTX 570 95 FPS
Radeon HD 6950 2GB 72 FPS
Difference: 23 FPS (32%)

Just Cause 2

Settings: Highest Settings
AA: 4x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Intel Core i7 920(ES) @ 4.0Ghz (Turbo Mode Enabled) (Source)
GeForce GTX 570 59 FPS
Radeon HD 6950 2GB 54 FPS
Difference: 5 FPS (9%)

GeForce GTX 570 wins

(Based entirely on the benchmarks listed above)

When combining all game benchmark scores on this page together, the GeForce GTX 570 wins overall, by 36 FPS. Please note that we do not have the results of every benchmark ever done for these cards, so the results may differ wildly in different games.

GeForce GTX 570 213 FPS
Radeon HD 6950 2GB 177 FPS
Difference: 36 FPS (20%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6950 2GB 200 Watts
GeForce GTX 570 219 Watts
Difference: 19 Watts (10%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon HD 6950 2GB, in theory, should perform a small bit faster than the GeForce GTX 570 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6950 2GB 160000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 570 152000 MB/sec
Difference: 8000 (5%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6950 2GB will be much (more or less 60%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 570. (explain)

Radeon HD 6950 2GB 70400 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 570 43920 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 26480 (60%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 570 is a better choice, though not by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 570 29280 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 6950 2GB 25600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3680 (14%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce GTX 570

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Radeon HD 6950 2GB

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 570 Radeon HD 6950 2GB
Manufacturer nVidia ATi
Year December 2010 December 2010
Code Name GF110 Cayman Pro
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
Memory 1280 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 732 MHz 800 MHz
Shader Speed 1464 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 950 MHz 1250 MHz
Unified Shaders 480 1408
Texture Mapping Units 60 88
Render Output Units 40 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 320-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 200 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 152000 MB/sec 160000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 43920 Mtexels/sec 70400 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 29280 Mpixels/sec 25600 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Facebook Activity

Comments

7 Responses to “GeForce GTX 570 vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB”

[...] Check this out: GeForce GTX 570 vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare [...]

[...] Eindeutig ne GTX 570 die GTX 570 ist Schneller als ne HD6950 siehe : GeForce GTX 570 vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare und Nen tikken langsamer ab und zu Schneller von den Benchmarks wie eine HD 6970. Mit der GTX 570 [...]

SRSGUYS says:

These benchmarks are poor. I get better average frames with my 6950 in these games (roughly 10 more in each)

tsoomoo says:

In 3dsmax viewport rendering. GTX570 is poor performance. HD6950 is very smooth performance !

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree