Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 430 1GB vs Radeon HD 5450

Intro

The GeForce GT 430 1GB makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 700 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a frequency of 900 MHz on this particular card. It features 96 SPUs as well as 16 Texture Address Units and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 5450, which comes with a clock frequency of 650 MHz and a DDR3 memory speed of 800 MHz. It also uses a 64-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It is made up of 80(16x5) SPUs, 8 Texture Address Units, and 4 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 5450 19 Watts
GeForce GT 430 1GB 60 Watts
Difference: 41 Watts (216%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GT 430 1GB should be 125% faster than the Radeon HD 5450 overall, because of its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GT 430 1GB 28800 MB/sec
Radeon HD 5450 12800 MB/sec
Difference: 16000 (125%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GT 430 1GB should be a lot (approximately 115%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon HD 5450. (explain)

GeForce GT 430 1GB 11200 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 5450 5200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 6000 (115%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GT 430 1GB is a better choice, though not by far. (explain)

GeForce GT 430 1GB 2800 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 5450 2600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 200 (8%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce GT 430 1GB

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Radeon HD 5450

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Specifications

Model GeForce GT 430 1GB Radeon HD 5450
Manufacturer nVidia ATi
Year October 2010 February 4, 2010
Code Name GF108 Cedar PRO
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 2.1 x16
Memory 1024 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 700 MHz 650 MHz
Shader Speed 1400 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 800 MHz (1600 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 96 80(16x5)
Texture Mapping Units 16 8
Render Output Units 4 4
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 64-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.2
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 19 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 12800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 11200 Mtexels/sec 5200 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2800 Mpixels/sec 2600 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree