Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs Radeon HD 6850

Intro

The GeForce GTX 285 1GB has a GPU core speed of 648 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR3 memory runs at 1242 MHz through a 512-bit bus. It also is comprised of 240 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6850, which features a core clock speed of 775 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1000 MHz. It also uses a 256-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is made up of 960 SPUs, 48 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6850 127 Watts
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 204 Watts
Difference: 77 Watts (61%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 285 1GB, in theory, should be quite a bit faster than the Radeon HD 6850 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 285 1GB 158976 MB/sec
Radeon HD 6850 128000 MB/sec
Difference: 30976 (24%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 285 1GB is a lot (more or less 39%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon HD 6850. (explain)

GeForce GTX 285 1GB 51840 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 6850 37200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 14640 (39%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the Radeon HD 6850 is the winner, though not by far. (explain)

Radeon HD 6850 24800 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 20736 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4064 (20%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 285 1GB

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 6850

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 285 1GB Radeon HD 6850
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year January 15, 2009 October 2010
Code Name G200b Barts Pro
Fab Process 55 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 648 MHz 775 MHz
Shader Speed 1476 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1242 MHz (2484 MHz effective) 1000 MHz (4000 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 240 960
Texture Mapping Units 80 48
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 512-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 204 watts 127 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 158976 MB/sec 128000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 51840 Mtexels/sec 37200 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 20736 Mpixels/sec 24800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs Radeon HD 6850”
[...] tinca mas la 285 ---------- Post added at 19:31 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ---------- GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs Radeon HD 6850 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare ---------- Post added at 23:29 ---------- Previous post was at 19:31 ---------- Pucha ayudenme [...]

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing