Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon R7 360 vs Radeon RX 460

Intro

The Radeon R7 360 makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 1050 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1625 MHz on this specific card. It features 768 SPUs as well as 48 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon RX 460, which has a GPU core clock speed of 1090 MHz, and 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1750 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 896 Stream Processors, 56 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon RX 460 75 Watts
Radeon R7 360 100 Watts
Difference: 25 Watts (33%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon RX 460 should be a little bit faster than the Radeon R7 360 overall. (explain)

Radeon RX 460 112000 MB/sec
Radeon R7 360 104000 MB/sec
Difference: 8000 (8%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX 460 should be quite a bit (more or less 21%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R7 360. (explain)

Radeon RX 460 61040 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 360 50400 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 10640 (21%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon RX 460 is superior to the Radeon R7 360, though only just barely. (explain)

Radeon RX 460 17440 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 360 16800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 640 (4%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 360

Amazon.com

Radeon RX 460

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon R7 360 Radeon RX 460
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year June 2015 August 2016
Code Name Tobago Polaris 11
Memory 2048 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 1050 MHz 1090 MHz
Memory Speed 6500 MHz 7000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 100 watts 75 watts
Bandwidth 104000 MB/sec 112000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50400 Mtexels/sec 61040 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16800 Mpixels/sec 17440 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 768 896
Texture Mapping Units 48 56
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 14 nm
Transistors 2080 million 3000 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 ×16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]