Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R9 380 4G

Intro

The Radeon R7 250 uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a speed of 1150 MHz on this model. It features 384 SPUs as well as 24 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 380 4G, which features GPU clock speed of 970 MHz, and 4096 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1425 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also features 1792 SPUs, 112 Texture Address Units, and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 380 4G 8837 points
Radeon R7 250 1836 points
Difference: 7001 (381%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
Radeon R9 380 4G 190 Watts
Difference: 125 Watts (192%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon R9 380 4G should theoretically be much superior to the Radeon R7 250 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 4G 182400 MB/sec
Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
Difference: 108800 (148%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 380 4G should be a lot (approximately 353%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R7 250. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 4G 108640 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 84640 (353%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon R9 380 4G is the winner, by far. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 4G 31040 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 23040 (288%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 380 4G

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon R7 250 Radeon R9 380 4G
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year October 2013 June 2015
Code Name Oland XT Antigua PRO
Memory 1024 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 1000 MHz 970 MHz
Memory Speed 4600 MHz 5700 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 190 watts
Bandwidth 73600 MB/sec 182400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 24000 Mtexels/sec 108640 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 8000 Mpixels/sec 31040 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 1792
Texture Mapping Units 24 112
Render Output Units 8 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1040 million 5000 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 ×16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.2 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 380 4G

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield