Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX Titan vs Geforce GTX 690

Intro

The GeForce GTX Titan makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 837 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a speed of 1502 MHz on this model. It features 2688 SPUs along with 224 Texture Address Units and 48 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Geforce GTX 690, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 915 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a speed of 1502 MHz on this model. It features 1536 SPUs as well as 128 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX Titan 250 Watts
Geforce GTX 690 300 Watts
Difference: 50 Watts (20%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Geforce GTX 690 is 33% quicker than the GeForce GTX Titan overall, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)

Geforce GTX 690 384512 MB/sec
GeForce GTX Titan 288384 MB/sec
Difference: 96128 (33%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 690 is much (more or less 25%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX Titan. (explain)

Geforce GTX 690 234240 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX Titan 187488 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 46752 (25%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 690 will be much (approximately 46%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX Titan, and able to handle higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Geforce GTX 690 58560 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX Titan 40176 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 18384 (46%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX Titan

Amazon.com

Geforce GTX 690

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX Titan Geforce GTX 690
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year February 2013 April 2012
Code Name GK110 GK104
Memory 6144 MB 2048 MB (x2)
Core Speed 837 MHz 915 MHz (x2)
Memory Speed 6008 MHz 6008 MHz (x2)
Power (Max TDP) 250 watts 300 watts
Bandwidth 288384 MB/sec 384512 MB/sec
Texel Rate 187488 Mtexels/sec 234240 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 40176 Mpixels/sec 58560 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 2688 1536 (x2)
Texture Mapping Units 224 128 (x2)
Render Output Units 48 32 (x2)
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 384-bit 256-bit (x2)
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 7080 million 3540 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.2

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

9 Responses to “GeForce GTX Titan vs Geforce GTX 690”
Anonymous says:

You can play crysis3 at very high graphics just using these gpus

SilenceMan says:

With high fps u mean cause a GTX 680 run it with about 50-60...my old GTX could run it in high with 40FPS

Gamer87 says:

Yes i can play too at very high with 50 fps with a GTX680, just when you use too much filtering it goes to 40-45fps

Anonymous says:

its better 3x sli gtx 670 the same price $1000

Gary says:

Do you hav any spec's on the gtx690 4GB version against the Titan?

LEEROY says:

Gary - speed will be near identical with cards where the only difference is memory capacity. Bus speed and core clocks etc are all the same. Only difference is more frame buffer, so the GPU can set aside larger, more detailed frames during its workload.

Anonymous says:

A GTX 690 is a 4GB card; the 4GB comes from each gpu (@ 2GB Each).

v3loxx says:

Can i play Battlefield 4 on max with one 690?

Can I play Battlefield 4 on 4k? (i guess, never on max settings and 4k :O)

Anonymous says:

I dont see why the 690 couldnt run bf4 max at 4k how ever if you were Id suggest turn some of the post processing off.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]