Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Intro

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti comes with a GPU core speed of 822 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM runs at 1002 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also features 384 SPUs, 64 Texture Address Units, and 32 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, which comes with clock speeds of 928 MHz on the GPU, and 1350 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 768 SPUs along with 64 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 110 Watts
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 170 Watts
Difference: 60 Watts (55%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti should theoretically be much superior to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 128256 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 86400 MB/sec
Difference: 41856 (48%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti should be a small bit (more or less 13%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 59392 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 52608 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 6784 (13%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 560 Ti is superior to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 26304 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 14848 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 11456 (77%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 560 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year January 2011 October 2012
Code Name GF114 GK106
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 822 MHz 928 MHz
Shader Speed 1645 MHz 928 MHz
Memory Speed 1002 MHz (4008 MHz effective) 1350 MHz (5400 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 384 768
Texture Mapping Units 64 64
Render Output Units 32 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 170 watts 110 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 128256 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 52608 Mtexels/sec 59392 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 26304 Mpixels/sec 14848 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree