Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 comes with a GPU core clock speed of 900 MHz, and the 2048 MB of DDR3 memory is set to run at 1782 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 384 Stream Processors, 32 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 550 Ti, which features clock speeds of 900 MHz on the GPU, and 1026 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 192 SPUs along with 32 Texture Address Units and 24 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 550 Ti 116 Watts
Difference: 51 Watts (78%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti, in theory, should be quite a bit faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 550 Ti 98496 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 41472 (73%)

Texel Rate

Both cards have the exact same texel rate, so theoretically they should perform equally good at at AF. (explain)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 550 Ti is superior to the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 550 Ti 21600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7200 (50%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 March 2011
Code Name GK107 GF116
Fab Process 28 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.1 x16
Memory 2048 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 900 MHz
Shader Speed 900 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory Speed 1782 MHz (3564 MHz effective) 1026 MHz (4104 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 384 192
Texture Mapping Units 32 32
Render Output Units 16 24
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 192-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 116 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 98496 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 28800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 21600 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing