Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 5770

Intro

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti features core speeds of 822 MHz on the GPU, and 1002 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 384 SPUs as well as 64 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 5770, which features GPU core speed of 850 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1200 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 800(160x5) SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 5770 108 Watts
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 170 Watts
Difference: 62 Watts (57%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti should be a lot faster than the Radeon HD 5770 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 128256 MB/sec
Radeon HD 5770 76800 MB/sec
Difference: 51456 (67%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti will be quite a bit (about 55%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 5770. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 52608 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 5770 34000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 18608 (55%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the winner, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 26304 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 5770 13600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 12704 (93%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 5770

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 560 Ti Radeon HD 5770
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year January 2011 October 13, 2009
Code Name GF114 Juniper XT
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 2.1 x16
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 822 MHz 850 MHz
Shader Speed 1645 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 4008 MHz 4800 MHz
Unified Shaders 384 800(160x5)
Texture Mapping Units 64 40
Render Output Units 32 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.2
Power (Max TDP) 170 watts 108 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 128256 MB/sec 76800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 52608 Mtexels/sec 34000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 26304 Mpixels/sec 13600 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

3 Responses to “GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 5770”

[...] permalink hier sind die beiden mal in vergleich... GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 5770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare [...]

[...] Third argument is upgradability. Go google “iMac”. Look at it. It’s a giant white square pancake with a keyboard and a mouse with one button connected to it. It’s like a laptop: not very powerful and annoying to upgrade. Notice I said “annoying” and not impossible. Upgrading RAM is just finding compatible RAM and slotting it in which I think means the Apple store or Apple suppliers only. Not much room for fans there either. I went to the electronics store here the other day and touched the back of the screen of an iMac that had been on all day… it literally burnt my fingers. You could look into the Mac Pro, the tower Mac but they range in price from $2.5k- $5k (AU$3k-$6k). Here I’d like to point out that for AU$3400 (comparing to the AU$6k Mac Pro), you can get the NRG Avalanche that has half the cores (6 cores @ 3.9Ghz that have been overclocked to 4.5Ghz), twice as much hard drive space (plus a 120GB SSD), 10GB more RAM, and a slightly more powerful graphics card. [...]

[...] and this build are between the CPU and graphics card. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti in our build offers significantly better performance, so if your needs are GPU-intensive you’re in much better shape with the Hack Pro. When it [...]

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing