Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon HD 6770 1GB

Intro

The GeForce GTX 470 has clock speeds of 607 MHz on the GPU, and 837 MHz on the 1280 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 448 SPUs as well as 56 Texture Address Units and 40 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6770 1GB, which has core clock speeds of 900 MHz on the GPU, and 1050 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 800 SPUs as well as 40 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6770 1GB 108 Watts
GeForce GTX 470 215 Watts
Difference: 107 Watts (99%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 470 should be 99% faster than the Radeon HD 6770 1GB overall, because of its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX 470 133920 MB/sec
Radeon HD 6770 1GB 67200 MB/sec
Difference: 66720 (99%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6770 1GB will be a small bit (about 6%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 470. (explain)

Radeon HD 6770 1GB 36000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 470 33992 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 2008 (6%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 470 is a better choice, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 470 24280 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 6770 1GB 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 9880 (69%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 470

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 6770 1GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 470 Radeon HD 6770 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 2010 January 2011
Code Name GF100 Juniper XT
Memory 1280 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 607 MHz 900 MHz
Memory Speed 3348 MHz 4200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 215 watts 108 watts
Bandwidth 133920 MB/sec 67200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 33992 Mtexels/sec 36000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 24280 Mpixels/sec 14400 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 448 800
Texture Mapping Units 56 40
Render Output Units 40 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 320-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Transistors 3000 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]