Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon HD 6770 1GB

Intro

The GeForce GTX 470 has a core clock speed of 607 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 837 MHz. It also uses a 320-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It features 448 SPUs, 56 Texture Address Units, and 40 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6770 1GB, which features clock speeds of 900 MHz on the GPU, and 1050 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 800 SPUs along with 40 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6770 1GB 108 Watts
GeForce GTX 470 215 Watts
Difference: 107 Watts (99%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 470 should perform a lot faster than the Radeon HD 6770 1GB overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 470 133920 MB/sec
Radeon HD 6770 1GB 67200 MB/sec
Difference: 66720 (99%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6770 1GB is a little bit (about 6%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 470. (explain)

Radeon HD 6770 1GB 36000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 470 33992 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 2008 (6%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 470 is the winner, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 470 24280 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 6770 1GB 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 9880 (69%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 470

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 6770 1GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 470 Radeon HD 6770 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 2010 January 2011
Code Name GF100 Juniper XT
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
Memory 1280 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 607 MHz 900 MHz
Shader Speed 1215 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 837 MHz (3348 MHz effective) 1050 MHz (4200 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 448 800
Texture Mapping Units 56 40
Render Output Units 40 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 320-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 215 watts 108 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 133920 MB/sec 67200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 33992 Mtexels/sec 36000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 24280 Mpixels/sec 14400 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree