Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 320 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Intro

The GeForce GT 320 features a GPU clock speed of 540 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR3 memory runs at 790 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 72 Stream Processors, 24 TAUs, and 8 ROPs.

Compare that to the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, which features a clock speed of 576 MHz and a GDDR3 memory frequency of 999 MHz. It also uses a 448-bit bus, and uses a 65 nm design. It is comprised of 216 SPUs, 72 Texture Address Units, and 28 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 320 43 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 159 Watts (370%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should in theory be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GT 320 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GT 320 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 86608 (343%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be quite a bit (more or less 220%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GT 320. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 320 12960 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 28512 (220%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is the winner, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 320 4320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 11808 (273%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 320 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year February 2010 September 16, 2008
Code Name GT215 G200
Memory 1024 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 540 MHz 576 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 1998 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 43 watts 202 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 111888 MB/sec
Texel Rate 12960 Mtexels/sec 41472 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4320 Mpixels/sec 16128 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 72 216
Texture Mapping Units 24 72
Render Output Units 8 28
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 448-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 65 nm
Transistors 727 million 1400 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in a second. It's calculated by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield