Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB vs Radeon HD 4670 1GB

Intro

The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB uses a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 600 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM runs at a frequency of 900 MHz on this specific model. It features 112 SPUs as well as 56 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 4670 1GB, which uses a 55 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 750 MHz. The GDDR4/GDDR3/DDR3/DDR2 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1100 MHz on this particular card. It features 320(64x5) SPUs along with 32 Texture Address Units and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X

Settings: High Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1680x1050
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Charts Test Rig (Source)
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 32 FPS
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 21 FPS
Difference: 11 FPS (52%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 4670 1GB 70 Watts
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 105 Watts
Difference: 35 Watts (50%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB should be much faster than the Radeon HD 4670 1GB overall. (explain)

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 57600 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 35200 MB/sec
Difference: 22400 (64%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB will be a lot (more or less 40%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 4670 1GB. (explain)

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 33600 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9600 (40%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 9600 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 6000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3600 (60%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 4670 1GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce 8800 GT 512MB Radeon HD 4670 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year Oct 2007 Sep 10, 2008
Code Name G92 RV730 XT
Fab Process 65 nm 55 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.0 x16, AGP 8x
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 600 MHz 750 MHz
Shader Speed 1500 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1100 MHz (2200 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 112 320(64x5)
Texture Mapping Units 56 32
Render Output Units 16 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR4/GDDR3/DDR3/DDR2
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 3.0
Power (Max TDP) 105 watts 70 watts
Shader Model 4.0 4.1
Bandwidth 57600 MB/sec 35200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 33600 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 9600 Mpixels/sec 6000 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree