Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB vs Radeon HD 4670 1GB


The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 600 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM runs at a frequency of 900 MHz on this particular model. It features 112 SPUs as well as 56 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 4670 1GB, which comes with core clock speeds of 750 MHz on the GPU, and 1100 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR4/GDDR3/DDR3/DDR2 memory. It features 320(64x5) SPUs along with 32 TAUs and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 4670 1GB 70 Watts
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 105 Watts
Difference: 35 Watts (50%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB should be 64% faster than the Radeon HD 4670 1GB in general, because of its higher data rate. (explain)

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 57600 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 35200 MB/sec
Difference: 22400 (64%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB should be a lot (about 40%) more effective at AF than the Radeon HD 4670 1GB. (explain)

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 33600 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9600 (40%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB should be much (about 60%) better at FSAA than the Radeon HD 4670 1GB, and also able to handle higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 9600 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 6000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3600 (60%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB

Radeon HD 4670 1GB

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 8800 GT 512MB Radeon HD 4670 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year Oct 2007 Sep 10, 2008
Code Name G92 RV730 XT
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 600 MHz 750 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 2200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 105 watts 70 watts
Bandwidth 57600 MB/sec 35200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 33600 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 9600 Mpixels/sec 6000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 112 320(64x5)
Texture Mapping Units 56 32
Render Output Units 16 8
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 55 nm
Transistors 754 million 514 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.0 x16, AGP 8x
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 3.0

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.


Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield