Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon Pro Duo

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon Pro Duo, which comes with a core clock speed of 1000 MHz and a HBM memory speed of 500 MHz. It also uses a 4096-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 4096 SPUs, 256 Texture Address Units, and 64 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon Pro Duo		27167 points
Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
	Difference: 21244 (359%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 760		170 Watts
Radeon Pro Duo		350 Watts
	Difference: 180 Watts (106%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon Pro Duo, in theory, should perform quite a bit faster than the Geforce GTX 760 in general. (explain)

Radeon Pro Duo		1024000 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
	Difference: 831744 (433%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon Pro Duo should be a lot (approximately 444%) faster with regards to AF than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

Radeon Pro Duo		512000 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 417920 (444%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon Pro Duo is a lot (about 308%) better at anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 760, and capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon Pro Duo		128000 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 96640 (308%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.