Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R9 285

Intro

The GeForce GT 340 has a GPU core speed of 550 MHz, and the 512 MB of GDDR5 RAM runs at 850 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 96 SPUs, 32 Texture Address Units, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon R9 285, which comes with clock speeds of 918 MHz on the GPU, and 1375 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1792 SPUs along with 112 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 340 69 Watts
Radeon R9 285 190 Watts
Difference: 121 Watts (175%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon R9 285 should theoretically be a lot better than the GeForce GT 340 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 285 176000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 340 54400 MB/sec
Difference: 121600 (224%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 285 is much (approximately 484%) better at AF than the GeForce GT 340. (explain)

Radeon R9 285 102816 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 340 17600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 85216 (484%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon R9 285 is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

Radeon R9 285 29376 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 340 4400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 24976 (568%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 340

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 285

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 340 Radeon R9 285
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2010 September 2014
Code Name GT215 Tonga PRO
Memory 512 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 550 MHz 918 MHz
Memory Speed 3400 MHz 5500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 69 watts 190 watts
Bandwidth 54400 MB/sec 176000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 17600 Mtexels/sec 102816 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4400 Mpixels/sec 29376 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 96 1792
Texture Mapping Units 32 112
Render Output Units 8 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 727 million 5000 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 4.4

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 340

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 285

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield