Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon R7 250X 2GB vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

The Radeon R7 250X 2GB has a GPU core clock speed of 1000 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 640 Stream Processors, 40 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R9 Nano, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 1000 MHz. The HBM memory is set to run at a frequency of 500 MHz on this specific model. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 TAUs and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 250X 2GB 95 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano 175 Watts
Difference: 80 Watts (84%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon R9 Nano should be quite a bit faster than the Radeon R7 250X 2GB overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 512000 MB/sec
Radeon R7 250X 2GB 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 440000 (611%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano will be quite a bit (approximately 540%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R7 250X 2GB. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 256000 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 250X 2GB 40000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 216000 (540%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be quite a bit (approximately 300%) more effective at AA than the Radeon R7 250X 2GB, and should be capable of handling higher resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 64000 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 250X 2GB 16000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 48000 (300%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 250X 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon R7 250X 2GB Radeon R9 Nano
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year February 2014 September 2015
Code Name Cape Verde XT Fiji XT
Memory 2048 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 4500 MHz 500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 95 watts 175 watts
Bandwidth 72000 MB/sec 512000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 40000 Mtexels/sec 256000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16000 Mpixels/sec 64000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 640 4096
Texture Mapping Units 40 256
Render Output Units 16 64
Bus Type GDDR5 HBM
Bus Width 128-bit 4096-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1500 million 8900 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.2 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R7 250X 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield