GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features a core clock speed of 1000 MHz and a HBM memory speed of 500 MHz. It also makes use of a 4096-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is made up of 4096 SPUs, 256 Texture Address Units, and 64 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
GeForce GTX 750		3958 points
	Difference: 10960 (277%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750		55 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
	Difference: 120 Watts (218%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Radeon R9 Nano should perform much faster than the GeForce GTX 750 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750		80000 MB/sec
	Difference: 432000 (540%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be much (approximately 684%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 750. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750		32640 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 223360 (684%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon R9 Nano is a better choice, by far. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750		16320 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 47680 (292%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.