GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare that to the Radeon R9 Nano, which has clock speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 500 MHz on the 4096 MB of HBM RAM. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 TAUs and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		4562 points
	Difference: 10356 (227%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Nano		402 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		72 Sol/s
	Difference: 330 (458%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti		60 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
	Difference: 115 Watts (192%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 Nano should be 493% quicker than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 425600 (493%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano will be a lot (more or less 527%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		40800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 215200 (527%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano will be a lot (about 292%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and will be capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		16320 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 47680 (292%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.