GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features GPU clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 4096 MB of HBM RAM set to run at 500 MHz through a 4096-bit bus. It also is comprised of 4096 SPUs, 256 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		4562 points
	Difference: 10356 (227%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Nano		402 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		72 Sol/s
	Difference: 330 (458%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti		60 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
	Difference: 115 Watts (192%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Radeon R9 Nano should perform much faster than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 425600 (493%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be a lot (more or less 527%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		40800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 215200 (527%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano is a lot (about 292%) better at AA than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and also will be able to handle higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		16320 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 47680 (292%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.