GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare that to the Radeon R9 Nano, which has a core clock frequency of 1000 MHz and a HBM memory frequency of 500 MHz. It also makes use of a 4096-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 4096 SPUs, 256 TAUs, and 64 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		4562 points
	Difference: 10356 (227%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Nano		402 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		72 Sol/s
	Difference: 330 (458%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti		60 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
	Difference: 115 Watts (192%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon R9 Nano should theoretically perform much faster than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 425600 (493%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be quite a bit (about 527%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		40800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 215200 (527%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano is much (more or less 292%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		16320 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 47680 (292%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.