Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon R9 M375

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm features a GPU clock speed of 576 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory is set to run at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also is comprised of 216 Stream Processors, 72 Texture Address Units, and 28 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 M375, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 1015 MHz. The DDR3 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1100 MHz on this particular card. It features 640 SPUs as well as 40 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should in theory perform a lot faster than the Radeon R9 M375 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M375 35200 MB/sec
Difference: 76688 (218%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm will be a little bit (more or less 2%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon R9 M375. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M375 40600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 872 (2%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon R9 M375 is a better choice, but not by far. (explain)

Radeon R9 M375 16240 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 112 (1%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M375

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm Radeon R9 M375
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year December 22, 2008 2015
Code Name G200b Cape Verde
Memory 896 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1015 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 2200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 35200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 40600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 16240 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 640
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M375

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield