Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R9 M365X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 comes with core speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon R9 M365X, which has a GPU core clock speed of 925 MHz, and 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 640 Stream Processors, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should perform much faster than the Radeon R9 M365X overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M365X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 39888 (55%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is just a bit (approximately 12%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R9 M365X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M365X 37000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 4472 (12%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a better choice, but only just. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M365X 14800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1328 (9%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M365X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R9 M365X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 2015
Code Name G200 Cape Verde
Memory 896 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 925 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 37000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 14800 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 640
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M365X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield