Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Geforce GTX 680 vs Radeon R9 M365X

Intro

The Geforce GTX 680 makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1006 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1502 MHz on this model. It features 1536 SPUs along with 128 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 M365X, which has core clock speeds of 925 MHz on the GPU, and 1125 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Geforce GTX 680 should perform much faster than the Radeon R9 M365X overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 192256 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M365X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 120256 (167%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 680 is much (approximately 248%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 M365X. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 128768 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M365X 37000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 91768 (248%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 680 should be quite a bit (about 118%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the Radeon R9 M365X, and should be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 32192 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M365X 14800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 17392 (118%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Geforce GTX 680

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M365X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Geforce GTX 680 Radeon R9 M365X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 2012 2015
Code Name GK104 Cape Verde
Memory 2048 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 1006 MHz 925 MHz
Memory Speed 6008 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 195 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 192256 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 128768 Mtexels/sec 37000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 32192 Mpixels/sec 14800 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1536 640
Texture Mapping Units 128 40
Render Output Units 32 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 3540 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Geforce GTX 680

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M365X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield