Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Geforce GTX 680 vs Radeon R9 M270X

Intro

The Geforce GTX 680 makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1006 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a frequency of 1502 MHz on this specific card. It features 1536 SPUs as well as 128 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 M270X, which features a clock frequency of 725 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1125 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 640 SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

The Geforce GTX 680, in theory, should perform a lot faster than the Radeon R9 M270X overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 192256 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 120256 (167%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 680 is much (about 344%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 M270X. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 128768 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 29000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 99768 (344%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 680 will be much (more or less 178%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon R9 M270X, and able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 32192 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 11600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 20592 (178%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Geforce GTX 680

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Geforce GTX 680 Radeon R9 M270X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 2012 May 1 2014
Code Name GK104 Venus XT
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1006 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 6008 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 195 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 192256 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 128768 Mtexels/sec 29000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 32192 Mpixels/sec 11600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1536 640
Texture Mapping Units 128 40
Render Output Units 32 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 3540 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Geforce GTX 680

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield