Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB vs Radeon R9 M270X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 928 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a frequency of 1350 MHz on this specific model. It features 768 SPUs as well as 64 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon R9 M270X, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 725 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a frequency of 1125 MHz on this particular card. It features 640 SPUs as well as 40 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB should be just a bit faster than the Radeon R9 M270X overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 86400 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 14400 (20%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB should be quite a bit (about 105%) better at AF than the Radeon R9 M270X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 59392 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 29000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 30392 (105%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB is the winner, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 14848 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 11600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3248 (28%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB Radeon R9 M270X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year October 2012 May 1 2014
Code Name GK106 Venus XT
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 928 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 5400 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 110 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 86400 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 59392 Mtexels/sec 29000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14848 Mpixels/sec 11600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 768 640
Texture Mapping Units 64 40
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 2540 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield