Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 M260

Intro

The Radeon HD 6750 has a clock frequency of 725 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1000 MHz. It also features a 128-bit bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It features 720 SPUs, 36 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 M260, which comes with a core clock speed of 715 MHz and a DDR3 memory frequency of 1000 MHz. It also uses a 64-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It features 384 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon HD 6750 should theoretically be quite a bit better than the Radeon R7 M260 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 64000 MB/sec
Radeon R7 M260 16000 MB/sec
Difference: 48000 (300%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6750 will be quite a bit (about 52%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R7 M260. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 26100 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 M260 17160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 8940 (52%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 6750 is a lot (about 103%) better at anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 M260, and should be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 11600 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 M260 5720 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 5880 (103%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon HD 6750

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon HD 6750 Radeon R7 M260
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year January 2011 June 2014
Code Name Juniper Pro Opal/Topaz
Memory 512 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 725 MHz 715 MHz
Memory Speed 4000 MHz 2000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 86 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 64000 MB/sec 16000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 26100 Mtexels/sec 17160 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 11600 Mpixels/sec 5720 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 720 384
Texture Mapping Units 36 24
Render Output Units 16 8
Bus Type GDDR5 DDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 64-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1040 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.0 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon HD 6750

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield