Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R5 M255

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM runs at a speed of 999 MHz on this specific model. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 Texture Address Units and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R5 M255, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 940 MHz. The DDR3 memory works at a frequency of 1000 MHz on this card. It features 320 SPUs as well as 20 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the Radeon R5 M255 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R5 M255 16000 MB/sec
Difference: 95888 (599%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be a lot (about 121%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R5 M255. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R5 M255 18800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 22672 (121%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R5 M255 7520 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 8608 (114%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R5 M255

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R5 M255
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 June 2014
Code Name G200 Jet Pro
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 940 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 2000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 16000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 18800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 7520 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 320
Texture Mapping Units 72 20
Render Output Units 28 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 64-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x8
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface within a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R5 M255

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield