GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX Titan X

Intro

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX Titan X, which uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a speed of 1750 MHz on this specific card. It features 3072 SPUs along with 192 Texture Address Units and 96 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX Titan X		17879 points
GeForce GTX 965M		5650 points
	Difference: 12229 (216%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 965M		60 Watts
GeForce GTX Titan X		250 Watts
	Difference: 190 Watts (317%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX Titan X should in theory be much superior to the GeForce GTX 965M in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan X		336000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 965M		64000 MB/sec
	Difference: 272000 (425%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan X should be quite a bit (about 218%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 965M. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan X		192000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 965M		60416 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 131584 (218%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan X is much (more or less 218%) more effective at FSAA than the GeForce GTX 965M, and also should be able to handle higher resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan X		96000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 965M		30208 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 65792 (218%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.