GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 8G

Intro

Compare that to the Radeon R9 390 8G, which has GPU core speed of 1000 MHz, and 8192 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1500 MHz through a 512-bit bus. It also is comprised of 2560 Stream Processors, 160 TAUs, and 64 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		17120 points
Radeon R9 390 8G		12733 points
	Difference: 4387 (34%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		425 Sol/s
Radeon R9 390 8G		326 Sol/s
	Difference: 99 (30%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 390 8G		28 Mh/s
GeForce GTX 980 Ti		22 Mh/s
	Difference: 6 (27%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		250 Watts
Radeon R9 390 8G		275 Watts
	Difference: 25 Watts (10%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R9 390 8G should theoretically be a small bit better than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 390 8G		384000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 980 Ti		336000 MB/sec
	Difference: 48000 (14%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti should be a small bit (about 10%) better at AF than the Radeon R9 390 8G. (explain)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		176000 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 390 8G		160000 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 16000 (10%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti will be much (about 50%) more effective at FSAA than the Radeon R9 390 8G, and will be able to handle higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		96000 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 390 8G		64000 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 32000 (50%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.