Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTS 250 512MB vs Radeon R9 380 4G

Intro

The GeForce GTS 250 512MB makes use of a 65/55 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 738 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM works at a frequency of 1100 MHz on this model. It features 128 SPUs along with 64 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon R9 380 4G, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 970 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1425 MHz on this specific card. It features 1792 SPUs as well as 112 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTS 250 512MB 145 Watts
Radeon R9 380 4G 190 Watts
Difference: 45 Watts (31%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Radeon R9 380 4G should perform much faster than the GeForce GTS 250 512MB overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 4G 182400 MB/sec
GeForce GTS 250 512MB 70400 MB/sec
Difference: 112000 (159%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 380 4G is much (more or less 130%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTS 250 512MB. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 4G 108640 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTS 250 512MB 47232 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 61408 (130%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon R9 380 4G is superior to the GeForce GTS 250 512MB, and very much so. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 4G 31040 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTS 250 512MB 11808 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 19232 (163%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 250 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 380 4G

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTS 250 512MB Radeon R9 380 4G
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 3, 2009 June 2015
Code Name G92a/b Antigua PRO
Memory 512 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 738 MHz 970 MHz
Memory Speed 2200 MHz 5700 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 145 watts 190 watts
Bandwidth 70400 MB/sec 182400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 47232 Mtexels/sec 108640 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 11808 Mpixels/sec 31040 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 128 1792
Texture Mapping Units 64 112
Render Output Units 16 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 65/55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 754 million 5000 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 ×16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 250 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 380 4G

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTS 250 512MB vs Radeon R9 380 4G”
Pandapapa says:

Jsjsiskykxnynbx hihgii nooo it is besser terefgiy get

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield