GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 380 2G

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 380 2G, which features core speeds of 970 MHz on the GPU, and 1425 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1792 SPUs along with 112 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 380 2G		8850 points
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		4562 points
	Difference: 4288 (94%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti		60 Watts
Radeon R9 380 2G		190 Watts
	Difference: 130 Watts (217%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R9 380 2G should in theory be much better than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 2G		182400 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 96000 (111%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 380 2G should be quite a bit (approximately 166%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 2G		108640 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		40800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 67840 (166%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high resolution is important to you, then the Radeon R9 380 2G is superior to the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, by a large margin. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 2G		31040 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		16320 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 14720 (90%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.