Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTS 250 1GB vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intro

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB makes use of a 65/55 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 738 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM works at a frequency of 1100 MHz on this specific card. It features 128 SPUs along with 64 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which has core clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 500 MHz on the 4096 MB of HBM RAM. It features 4096 SPUs along with 256 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 145 Watts
Radeon R9 Fury X 275 Watts
Difference: 130 Watts (90%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon R9 Fury X should theoretically perform a lot faster than the GeForce GTS 250 1GB overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X 512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 70400 MB/sec
Difference: 441600 (627%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Fury X will be quite a bit (more or less 469%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTS 250 1GB. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X 268800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 47232 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 221568 (469%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon R9 Fury X is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X 67200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 11808 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 55392 (469%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Fury X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTS 250 1GB Radeon R9 Fury X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 3, 2009 June 2015
Code Name G92a/b Fiji XT
Memory 1024 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 738 MHz 1050 MHz
Memory Speed 2200 MHz 500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 145 watts 275 watts
Bandwidth 70400 MB/sec 512000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 47232 Mtexels/sec 268800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 11808 Mpixels/sec 67200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 128 4096
Texture Mapping Units 64 256
Render Output Units 16 64
Bus Type GDDR3 HBM
Bus Width 256-bit 4096-bit
Fab Process 65/55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 754 million 8900 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Fury X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield