GeForce GTX Titan Black vs Geforce GTX 760

Intro

Compare all of that to the Geforce GTX 760, which uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 980 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a speed of 1502 MHz on this particular model. It features 1152 SPUs as well as 96 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX Titan Black		11666 points
Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
	Difference: 5743 (97%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 760		170 Watts
GeForce GTX Titan Black		250 Watts
	Difference: 80 Watts (47%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX Titan Black should be quite a bit faster than the Geforce GTX 760 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan Black		336000 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
	Difference: 143744 (75%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan Black is much (more or less 127%) more effective at texture filtering than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan Black		213360 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 119280 (127%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan Black will be much (approximately 36%) more effective at full screen anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 760, and will be able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan Black		42672 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 11312 (36%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.