Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 270

Intro

The Geforce GTX 760 features a GPU core speed of 980 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1502 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 1152 Stream Processors, 96 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 270, which comes with GPU clock speed of 900 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1400 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 1280 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R9 270 150 Watts
Geforce GTX 760 170 Watts
Difference: 20 Watts (13%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Geforce GTX 760 should be just a bit faster than the Radeon R9 270 overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 192256 MB/sec
Radeon R9 270 179200 MB/sec
Difference: 13056 (7%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 will be quite a bit (approximately 31%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon R9 270. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 94080 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 270 72000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 22080 (31%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Geforce GTX 760 is the winner, though not by far. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 31360 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 270 28800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2560 (9%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Geforce GTX 760

Amazon.com

Radeon R9 270

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model Geforce GTX 760 Radeon R9 270
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 2013 November 2013
Code Name GK104 Curacao Pro
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 980 MHz 900 MHz
Shader Speed 980 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) 1400 MHz (5600 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 1152 1280
Texture Mapping Units 96 80
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 170 watts 150 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 192256 MB/sec 179200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 94080 Mtexels/sec 72000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 31360 Mpixels/sec 28800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

2 Responses to “Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 270”
Umbraxis says:
Wow... price-to-performance on the Nvidia card is absolutely pathetic.

Guess you're paying for the brand.

rodrigues says:
nvidia no more. It Dosn't worth the difference of prices.

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing