 |
 |
GeForce GT 210 vs Radeon R7 260X
Intro
The GeForce GT 210 features a core clock frequency of 589 MHz and a DDR3 memory frequency of 800 MHz. It also uses a 64-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is comprised of 16 SPUs, 8 Texture Address Units, and 4 ROPs.Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 260X, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 1100 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a speed of 1625 MHz on this particular card. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GT 210 |
|
31 Watts |
| Radeon R7 260X |
|
115 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The Radeon R7 260X should in theory perform much faster than the GeForce GT 210 overall. (explain)
| Radeon R7 260X |
|
104000 MB/sec |
| GeForce GT 210 |
|
12800 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon R7 260X should be much (about 1207%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 210. (explain)| Radeon R7 260X |
|
61600 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GT 210 |
|
4712 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon R7 260X is superior to the GeForce GT 210, by far. (explain)| Radeon R7 260X |
|
17600 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GT 210 |
|
2356 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GT 210Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R7 260XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GT 210 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | October 2009 | October 2013 |
| Code Name | GT218 | Bonaire XTX |
| Memory | 512 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 589 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1600 MHz | 6500 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 31 watts | 115 watts |
| Bandwidth | 12800 MB/sec | 104000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 4712 Mtexels/sec | 61600 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 2356 Mpixels/sec | 17600 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 16 | 896 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 8 | 56 |
| Render Output Units | 4 | 16 |
| Bus Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 260 million | 2080 million |
| Bus | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10.1 | DirectX 11.2 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.2 | OpenGL 4.3 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.
GeForce GT 210Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R7 260XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GT 210 vs Radeon R7 260X”arthur seu boiolinha xupa essa