Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon HD 4670 1GB


The Geforce GTX 760 has a clock frequency of 980 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1502 MHz. It also makes use of a 256-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 1152 SPUs, 96 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 4670 1GB, which uses a 55 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 750 MHz. The GDDR4/GDDR3/DDR3/DDR2 memory runs at a speed of 1100 MHz on this card. It features 320(64x5) SPUs along with 32 Texture Address Units and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 4670 1GB 70 Watts
Geforce GTX 760 170 Watts
Difference: 100 Watts (143%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Geforce GTX 760 should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the Radeon HD 4670 1GB overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 192256 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 35200 MB/sec
Difference: 157056 (446%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 should be much (approximately 292%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon HD 4670 1GB. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 94080 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 70080 (292%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Geforce GTX 760 is the winner, by a large margin. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 31360 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 6000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 25360 (423%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Geforce GTX 760

Radeon HD 4670 1GB

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Geforce GTX 760 Radeon HD 4670 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 2013 Sep 10, 2008
Code Name GK104 RV730 XT
Memory 2048 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 980 MHz 750 MHz
Memory Speed 6008 MHz 2200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 170 watts 70 watts
Bandwidth 192256 MB/sec 35200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 94080 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 31360 Mpixels/sec 6000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1152 320(64x5)
Texture Mapping Units 96 32
Render Output Units 32 8
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 55 nm
Transistors 3540 million 514 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16, AGP 8x
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 3.0

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.


Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield