Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon HD 4670 1GB

Intro

The Geforce GTX 760 comes with clock speeds of 980 MHz on the GPU, and 1502 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1152 SPUs along with 96 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 4670 1GB, which features core speeds of 750 MHz on the GPU, and 1100 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR4/GDDR3/DDR3/DDR2 RAM. It features 320(64x5) SPUs as well as 32 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 4670 1GB 70 Watts
Geforce GTX 760 170 Watts
Difference: 100 Watts (143%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Geforce GTX 760 should in theory be a lot faster than the Radeon HD 4670 1GB overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 192256 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 35200 MB/sec
Difference: 157056 (446%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 is a lot (more or less 292%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 4670 1GB. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 94080 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 70080 (292%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Geforce GTX 760 is a better choice, by far. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 31360 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 1GB 6000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 25360 (423%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Geforce GTX 760

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 4670 1GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Geforce GTX 760 Radeon HD 4670 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 2013 Sep 10, 2008
Code Name GK104 RV730 XT
Memory 2048 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 980 MHz 750 MHz
Memory Speed 6008 MHz 2200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 170 watts 70 watts
Bandwidth 192256 MB/sec 35200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 94080 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 31360 Mpixels/sec 6000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1152 320(64x5)
Texture Mapping Units 96 32
Render Output Units 32 8
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR4/GDDR3/DDR3/DDR2
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 55 nm
Transistors 3540 million 514 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16, AGP 8x
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 3.0

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]