 |
 |
Submit Benchmarks!
Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon HD 7950 3GB
Intro
The Geforce GTX 760 has a GPU core clock speed of 980 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1502 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is made up of 1152 SPUs, 96 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 7950 3GB, which comes with GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, and 3072 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1250 MHz through a 384-bit bus. It also is made up of 1792 SPUs, 112 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
170 Watts |
| Radeon HD 7950 3GB |
|
200 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Theoretically speaking, the Radeon HD 7950 3GB should perform much faster than the Geforce GTX 760 in general. (explain)
| Radeon HD 7950 3GB |
|
240000 MB/sec |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
192256 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Geforce GTX 760 should be a bit (more or less 5%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon HD 7950 3GB. (explain)| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
94080 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 7950 3GB |
|
89600 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The Geforce GTX 760 is much (approximately 23%) more effective at AA than the Radeon HD 7950 3GB, and capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
31360 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 7950 3GB |
|
25600 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Geforce GTX 760Amazon.com
|
Radeon HD 7950 3GBAmazon.com
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Geforce GTX 760 | Radeon HD 7950 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | June 2013 | January 2012 |
| Code Name | GK104 | Tahiti Pro |
| Memory | 2048 MB | 3072 MB |
| Core Speed | 980 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 170 watts | 200 watts |
| Bandwidth | 192256 MB/sec | 240000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 94080 Mtexels/sec | 89600 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 31360 Mpixels/sec | 25600 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 1152 | 1792 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 96 | 112 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 3540 million | 4313 million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.0 | DirectX 11.1 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.3 | OpenGL 4.2 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.
Geforce GTX 760Amazon.com
|
Radeon HD 7950 3GBAmazon.com
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Comments
4 Responses to “Geforce GTX 760 vs Radeon HD 7950 3GB”amd PENETRATES everything
Jesus, look how behind the times compared with the 7950 the 760 is. The 7950 still beats it in IRL, even 18 months on...
The 760 is a newer card than the 7950. What are you talking about?
actually... in real world tests, the 760 would outperform a 7950 by a few fps just because of the nvidia drivers... if mantle was included in every game however, then the amd card would win..... i own an xfx radeon hd 7950, and i can say, it is a good card, but nothing compared to nvidia cards