Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX Titan

Intro

The GeForce GTX 295 uses a 55 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory works at a speed of 999 MHz on this particular card. It features 240 SPUs as well as 80 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX Titan, which features GPU clock speed of 837 MHz, and 6144 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1502 MHz through a 384-bit bus. It also features 2688 SPUs, 224 TAUs, and 48 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX Titan 250 Watts
GeForce GTX 295 289 Watts
Difference: 39 Watts (16%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX Titan, in theory, should perform quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 295 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan 288384 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 295 223776 MB/sec
Difference: 64608 (29%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan is quite a bit (more or less 103%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 295. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan 187488 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 295 92160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 95328 (103%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX Titan is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan 40176 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 295 32256 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7920 (25%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 295

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX Titan

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 295 GeForce GTX Titan
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year January 8, 2009 February 2013
Code Name G200b GK110
Memory 896 MB (x2) 6144 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz (x2) 837 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz (x2) 6008 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 289 watts 250 watts
Bandwidth 223776 MB/sec 288384 MB/sec
Texel Rate 92160 Mtexels/sec 187488 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 32256 Mpixels/sec 40176 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 (x2) 2688
Texture Mapping Units 80 (x2) 224
Render Output Units 28 (x2) 48
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit (x2) 384-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 7080 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]