Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX Titan

Intro

The GeForce GTX 295 uses a 55 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory works at a speed of 999 MHz on this card. It features 240 SPUs along with 80 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX Titan, which comes with GPU core speed of 837 MHz, and 6144 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1502 MHz through a 384-bit bus. It also is made up of 2688 Stream Processors, 224 TAUs, and 48 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX Titan 250 Watts
GeForce GTX 295 289 Watts
Difference: 39 Watts (16%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX Titan should in theory perform a lot faster than the GeForce GTX 295 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan 288384 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 295 223776 MB/sec
Difference: 64608 (29%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan should be quite a bit (approximately 103%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 295. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan 187488 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 295 92160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 95328 (103%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan is much (about 25%) faster with regards to FSAA than the GeForce GTX 295, and also capable of handling higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan 40176 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 295 32256 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7920 (25%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 295

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX Titan

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 295 GeForce GTX Titan
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year January 8, 2009 February 2013
Code Name G200b GK110
Memory 896 MB (x2) 6144 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz (x2) 837 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz (x2) 6008 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 289 watts 250 watts
Bandwidth 223776 MB/sec 288384 MB/sec
Texel Rate 92160 Mtexels/sec 187488 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 32256 Mpixels/sec 40176 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 (x2) 2688
Texture Mapping Units 80 (x2) 224
Render Output Units 28 (x2) 48
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit (x2) 384-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 7080 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]