Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon HD 4350

Intro

The GeForce GTX 650 makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 1058 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a speed of 1250 MHz on this specific card. It features 384 SPUs as well as 32 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 4350, which has core speeds of 575 MHz on the GPU, and 500 MHz on the 512 MB of DDR2 RAM. It features 80(16x5) SPUs along with 8 TAUs and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 4350 22 Watts
GeForce GTX 650 64 Watts
Difference: 42 Watts (191%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 650 should be 900% faster than the Radeon HD 4350 overall, because of its higher data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 80000 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4350 8000 MB/sec
Difference: 72000 (900%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 should be much (more or less 636%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 4350. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 33856 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4350 4600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 29256 (636%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 650 is superior to the Radeon HD 4350, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 16928 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4350 2300 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 14628 (636%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 650

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 4350

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 650 Radeon HD 4350
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 2012 Sep 30, 2008
Code Name GK107 RV710
Fab Process 28 nm 55 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16, PCI
Memory 2048 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 1058 MHz 575 MHz
Shader Speed 1058 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 5000 MHz 1000 MHz
Unified Shaders 384 80(16x5)
Texture Mapping Units 32 8
Render Output Units 16 4
Bus Type GDDR5 DDR2
Bus Width 128-bit 64-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 3.0
Power (Max TDP) 64 watts 22 watts
Shader Model 5.0 4.1
Bandwidth 80000 MB/sec 8000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 33856 Mtexels/sec 4600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16928 Mpixels/sec 2300 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing