Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon HD 6770 1GB


Intro

The GeForce GTX 650 features core speeds of 1058 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 384 SPUs as well as 32 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 6770 1GB, which makes use of a 40 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 900 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1050 MHz on this particular card. It features 800 SPUs along with 40 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 64 Watts
Radeon HD 6770 1GB 108 Watts
Difference: 44 Watts (69%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce GTX 650 should be a bit faster than the Radeon HD 6770 1GB overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 80000 MB/sec
Radeon HD 6770 1GB 67200 MB/sec
Difference: 12800 (19%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6770 1GB should be a bit (approximately 6%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 650. (explain)

Radeon HD 6770 1GB 36000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 33856 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 2144 (6%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 650 is a better choice, but only just. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 16928 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 6770 1GB 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2528 (18%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 650

Radeon HD 6770 1GB

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 650 Radeon HD 6770 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 2012 January 2011
Code Name GK107 Juniper XT
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 1058 MHz 900 MHz
Memory Speed 5000 MHz 4200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 64 watts 108 watts
Bandwidth 80000 MB/sec 67200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 33856 Mtexels/sec 36000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16928 Mpixels/sec 14400 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 800
Texture Mapping Units 32 40
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1300 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

GeForce GTX 650

Radeon HD 6770 1GB

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]