 |
 |
|
|
|
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 650
Intro
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has core clock speeds of 732 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 1280 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 448 SPUs along with 56 TAUs and 40 ROPs.Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 650, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1058 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a frequency of 1250 MHz on this particular model. It features 384 SPUs along with 32 TAUs and 16 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GTX 650 |
|
64 Watts |
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|
210 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
In theory, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 should be much faster than the GeForce GTX 650 in general. (explain)
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|
144000 MB/sec |
| GeForce GTX 650 |
|
80000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 will be a lot (about 21%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 650. (explain)| GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|
40992 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 650 |
|
33856 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is much (approximately 73%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 650, and should be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)| GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|
29280 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 650 |
|
16928 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448Amazon.com
Other US-based stores
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.de
Amazon.fr
|
GeForce GTX 650Amazon.com
Other US-based stores
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.de
Amazon.fr
|
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | nVidia |
| Year | December 2011 | September 2012 |
| Code Name | GF110 | GK107 |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory | 1280 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 732 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Shader Speed | 1464 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz (3600 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective) |
| Unified Shaders | 448 | 384 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 56 | 32 |
| Render Output Units | 40 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit | 128-bit |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11.1 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.2 | OpenGL 4.3 |
| Power (Max TDP) | 210 watts | 64 watts |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Bandwidth | 144000 MB/sec | 80000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 40992 Mtexels/sec | 33856 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 29280 Mpixels/sec | 16928 Mpixels/sec |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!