 |
 |
|
|
|
GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Intro
The GeForce GTX 660 features a GPU core speed of 980 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1502 MHz through a 192-bit bus. It also features 960 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 24 ROPs.Compare all of that to the GeForce GTX 660 Ti, which has GPU clock speed of 915 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1500 MHz through a 192-bit bus. It also is comprised of 1344 SPUs, 112 TAUs, and 24 Raster Operation Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GTX 660 |
|
140 Watts |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|
150 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
In theory, the GeForce GTX 660 is 0% faster than the GeForce GTX 660 Ti overall, because of its higher data rate. (explain)
| GeForce GTX 660 |
|
144192 MB/sec |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|
144000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti should be quite a bit (about 31%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 660. (explain)| GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|
102480 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 660 |
|
78400 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The GeForce GTX 660 should be a bit (about 7%) better at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 660 Ti, and capable of handling higher resolutions better. (explain)| GeForce GTX 660 |
|
23520 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|
21960 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 660Amazon.com
|
GeForce GTX 660 TiAmazon.com
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 660 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | nVidia |
| Year | September 2012 | August 2012 |
| Code Name | GK106 | GK104 |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory | 2048 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 980 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Shader Speed | 980 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 1500 MHz (6000 MHz effective) |
| Unified Shaders | 960 | 1344 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 80 | 112 |
| Render Output Units | 24 | 24 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.0 | DirectX 11.0 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.3 | OpenGL 4.3 |
| Power (Max TDP) | 140 watts | 150 watts |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Bandwidth | 144192 MB/sec | 144000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 78400 Mtexels/sec | 102480 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 23520 Mpixels/sec | 21960 Mpixels/sec |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.
Comments
32 Responses to “GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti”msg2short
GTX 660 costs about 200$+ and is just about 30-40% slover than a GTX 670 which cost 400$...
You will not see difference if you don't have problems with FPS...
if we want to use ATi radeon 7870 we need amd motherboard cause this card has crossfire technology which is you can only use on amd motherboards
in this video he have intel motherboard so u are wrong u can install this card on intel motherboard
so prefer 660 Ti if there is no problum of money
Don't talk about what you do or do not know when you can't even speak english. Get a life and don't go dissing other people MR "Better than you guys" You seem like a tosspot nub.
The 660 TI was just out of my price range, at $230, plus $15 shipping.
Both cards have similar performance, and I'd rather spend the extra $85 towards an SSD.
It just depends on what kind of deals you can get, and of course I'm limited by my 460 watt power supply until I can upgrade it.