Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8300 GS (OEM) vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Intro

The GeForce 8300 GS (OEM) makes use of a 80 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 450 MHz. The DDR2 RAM runs at a speed of 400 MHz on this particular card. It features 8 SPUs along with 4 Texture Address Units and 2 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 660 Ti, which comes with a core clock frequency of 915 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1500 MHz. It also features a 192-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 1344 SPUs, 112 TAUs, and 24 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 8300 GS (OEM) 40 Watts
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 150 Watts
Difference: 110 Watts (275%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti, in theory, should perform much faster than the GeForce 8300 GS (OEM) overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 660 Ti 144000 MB/sec
GeForce 8300 GS (OEM) 6400 MB/sec
Difference: 137600 (2150%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is quite a bit (approximately 5593%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce 8300 GS (OEM). (explain)

GeForce GTX 660 Ti 102480 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 8300 GS (OEM) 1800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 100680 (5593%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti will be quite a bit (more or less 2340%) better at AA than the GeForce 8300 GS (OEM), and also will be able to handle higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

GeForce GTX 660 Ti 21960 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 8300 GS (OEM) 900 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 21060 (2340%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce 8300 GS (OEM)

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Specifications

Model GeForce 8300 GS (OEM) GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year July 2007 August 2012
Code Name G86 GK104
Fab Process 80 nm 28 nm
Bus PCI Express x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 128 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 450 MHz 915 MHz
Shader Speed 900 MHz 915 MHz
Memory Speed 400 MHz (800 MHz effective) 1500 MHz (6000 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 8 1344
Texture Mapping Units 4 112
Render Output Units 2 24
Bus Type DDR2 GDDR5
Bus Width 64-bit 192-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 40 watts 150 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 6400 MB/sec 144000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 1800 Mtexels/sec 102480 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 900 Mpixels/sec 21960 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree