Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 260

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 has core clock speeds of 900 MHz on the GPU, and 1782 MHz on the 2048 MB of DDR3 RAM. It features 384 SPUs along with 32 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 260, which comes with a GPU core clock speed of 576 MHz, and 896 MB of GDDR3 RAM set to run at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also is made up of 192 Stream Processors, 64 Texture Address Units, and 28 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 182 Watts
Difference: 117 Watts (180%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 should be quite a bit faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 54864 (96%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 is a lot (about 28%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 36864 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 8064 (28%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 is a bit (about 12%) faster with regards to AA than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, and also should be capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 16128 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1728 (12%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 260

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 260
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 June 16, 2008
Code Name GK107 G200
Fab Process 28 nm 65 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16 2.0
Memory 2048 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 576 MHz
Shader Speed 900 MHz 1242 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 1998 MHz
Unified Shaders 384 192
Texture Mapping Units 32 64
Render Output Units 16 28
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 448-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 3.1
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 182 watts
Shader Model 5.0 4.0
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 111888 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 36864 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 16128 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing