Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 260

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 features a GPU clock speed of 900 MHz, and the 2048 MB of DDR3 RAM runs at 1782 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 384 SPUs, 32 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all that to the GeForce GTX 260, which comes with GPU core speed of 576 MHz, and 896 MB of GDDR3 memory set to run at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also features 192 SPUs, 64 TAUs, and 28 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 182 Watts
Difference: 117 Watts (180%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 260 should be quite a bit faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 54864 (96%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 should be quite a bit (about 28%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 36864 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 8064 (28%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 is superior to the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, though only just barely. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 16128 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1728 (12%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 260

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 260
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 June 16, 2008
Code Name GK107 G200
Memory 2048 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 576 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 1998 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 182 watts
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 111888 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 36864 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 16128 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 192
Texture Mapping Units 32 64
Render Output Units 16 28
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 448-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 65 nm
Transistors 1300 million 1400 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]