Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 460


The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 comes with a GPU core clock speed of 900 MHz, and the 2048 MB of DDR3 memory is set to run at 1782 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 384 SPUs, 32 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 460, which comes with a GPU core clock speed of 675 MHz, and 768 MB of GDDR5 RAM set to run at 900 MHz through a 192-bit bus. It also is comprised of 336 Stream Processors, 56 Texture Address Units, and 24 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 460 150 Watts
Difference: 85 Watts (131%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 460 should be 52% faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 in general, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 29376 (52%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 460 will be much (about 31%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 37800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9000 (31%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 460 is the winner, but not by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 16200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1800 (13%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

GeForce GTX 460

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 460
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 July 2010
Code Name GK107 GF104
Memory 2048 MB 768 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 675 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 3600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 150 watts
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 37800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 16200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 336
Texture Mapping Units 32 56
Render Output Units 16 24
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 192-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1300 million 1950 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.


Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield