Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 460


The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 900 MHz. The DDR3 RAM runs at a frequency of 1782 MHz on this particular model. It features 384 SPUs as well as 32 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 460, which makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 675 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a speed of 900 MHz on this card. It features 336 SPUs as well as 56 Texture Address Units and 24 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 460 150 Watts
Difference: 85 Watts (131%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 460 should in theory be a lot superior to the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 29376 (52%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 460 will be quite a bit (more or less 31%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 37800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9000 (31%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 460 is the winner, but only just. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 16200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1800 (13%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

GeForce GTX 460

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 460
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 July 2010
Code Name GK107 GF104
Memory 2048 MB 768 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 675 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 3600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 150 watts
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 37800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 16200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 336
Texture Mapping Units 32 56
Render Output Units 16 24
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 192-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1300 million 1950 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.


Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield