Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 460

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 comes with a GPU core clock speed of 900 MHz, and the 2048 MB of DDR3 memory runs at 1782 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 384 SPUs, 32 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Compare all that to the GeForce GTX 460, which has a clock speed of 675 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 900 MHz. It also features a 192-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It features 336 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 24 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 460 150 Watts
Difference: 85 Watts (131%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 460 is 52% faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 overall, due to its greater bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 29376 (52%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 460 is a lot (about 31%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 37800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9000 (31%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 460 is superior to the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, but not by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 16200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1800 (13%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 460

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 460
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 July 2010
Code Name GK107 GF104
Memory 2048 MB 768 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 675 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 3600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 150 watts
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 37800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 16200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 336
Texture Mapping Units 32 56
Render Output Units 16 24
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 192-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1300 million 1950 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]