Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 460

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 900 MHz. The DDR3 RAM works at a frequency of 1782 MHz on this card. It features 384 SPUs along with 32 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 460, which features clock speeds of 675 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 768 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 336 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 24 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 460 150 Watts
Difference: 85 Watts (131%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 460 should perform much faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 29376 (52%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 460 should be a lot (more or less 31%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 37800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9000 (31%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 460 will be a little bit (about 13%) better at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, and also will be able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 16200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1800 (13%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 460

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 460
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 July 2010
Code Name GK107 GF104
Memory 2048 MB 768 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 675 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 3600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 150 watts
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 37800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 16200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 336
Texture Mapping Units 32 56
Render Output Units 16 24
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 192-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1300 million 1950 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]