Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon HD 7770

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm features a core clock speed of 576 MHz and a GDDR3 memory frequency of 999 MHz. It also uses a 448-bit bus, and uses a 55 nm design. It features 216 SPUs, 72 TAUs, and 28 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 7770, which features a core clock speed of 1000 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1125 MHz. It also features a 128-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is made up of 640 SPUs, 40 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7770 80 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 171 Watts
Difference: 91 Watts (114%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm is 55% faster than the Radeon HD 7770 in general, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7770 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 39888 (55%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should be a bit (approximately 4%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon HD 7770. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7770 40000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 1472 (4%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm is a small bit (about 1%) more effective at AA than the Radeon HD 7770, and also will be capable of handling higher resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7770 16000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 128 (1%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 7770

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm Radeon HD 7770
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year December 22, 2008 February 2012
Code Name G200b Cape Verde XT
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts 80 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 40000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 16000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 640
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1500 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 7770

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon HD 7770”
AJUTOR : Recomandare Placa Video says:

[...] o sursa buna, si nu mereu ce e nou e si bun. Da 650 TI e peste HD 7770, dar HD 7770 e sub GTX 260. GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon HD 7770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware C... " -Domnu', domnu', veniti aici. Luati, au talpa noua. -Si dumneavoastra? -Eu maine ma [...]

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield