Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

A Question

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 7750

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 has a GPU core clock speed of 633 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory runs at 1134 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also features 240 SPUs, 80 Texture Address Units, and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 7750, which has a GPU core clock speed of 800 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 512 SPUs, 32 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7750 55 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 164 Watts (298%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 275 will be 76% faster than the Radeon HD 7750 in general, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7750 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 55008 (76%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 should be much (approximately 98%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon HD 7750. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 25600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 25040 (98%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 should be much (about 38%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Radeon HD 7750, and should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 12800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4924 (38%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 7750

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon HD 7750
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 February 2012
Code Name G200b Cape Verde Pro
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 800 MHz
Shader Speed 1404 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 2268 MHz 4500 MHz
Unified Shaders 240 512
Texture Mapping Units 80 32
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 55 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 25600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 12800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]