Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 7750

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 uses a 55 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 633 MHz. The GDDR3 memory works at a frequency of 1134 MHz on this particular card. It features 240 SPUs as well as 80 TAUs and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 7750, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 800 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a frequency of 1125 MHz on this particular card. It features 512 SPUs as well as 32 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7750 55 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 164 Watts (298%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 275 should theoretically be much faster than the Radeon HD 7750 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7750 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 55008 (76%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 should be a lot (more or less 98%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon HD 7750. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 25600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 25040 (98%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 is a lot (more or less 38%) faster with regards to AA than the Radeon HD 7750, and also will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 12800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4924 (38%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 7750

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon HD 7750
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 February 2012
Code Name G200b Cape Verde Pro
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 800 MHz
Shader Speed 1404 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1134 MHz (2268 MHz effective) 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 240 512
Texture Mapping Units 80 32
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 55 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 25600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 12800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing