Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 7750

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 comes with clock speeds of 633 MHz on the GPU, and 1134 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 240 SPUs along with 80 TAUs and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 7750, which features GPU core speed of 800 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 512 Stream Processors, 32 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7750 55 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 164 Watts (298%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 275 will be 76% faster than the Radeon HD 7750 overall, because of its greater bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7750 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 55008 (76%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 will be much (approximately 98%) better at AF than the Radeon HD 7750. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 25600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 25040 (98%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 is a lot (approximately 38%) better at anti-aliasing than the Radeon HD 7750, and should be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 12800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4924 (38%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 7750

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon HD 7750
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 February 2012
Code Name G200b Cape Verde Pro
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 800 MHz
Shader Speed 1404 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1134 MHz (2268 MHz effective) 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 240 512
Texture Mapping Units 80 32
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 55 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 25600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 12800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree