Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 7750

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 features a core clock speed of 633 MHz and a GDDR3 memory speed of 1134 MHz. It also makes use of a 448-bit bus, and makes use of a 55 nm design. It features 240 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 28 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 7750, which comes with core speeds of 800 MHz on the GPU, and 1125 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 512 SPUs along with 32 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7750 55 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 164 Watts (298%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 275 should in theory be quite a bit superior to the Radeon HD 7750 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7750 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 55008 (76%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 is a lot (approximately 98%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 7750. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 25600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 25040 (98%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 is quite a bit (more or less 38%) more effective at FSAA than the Radeon HD 7750, and also capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 12800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4924 (38%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 7750

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon HD 7750
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 February 2012
Code Name G200b Cape Verde Pro
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 800 MHz
Memory Speed 2268 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 55 watts
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 25600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 12800 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 512
Texture Mapping Units 80 32
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1500 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]