Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon HD 7770

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm features core speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 Texture Address Units and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 7770, which comes with GPU clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM set to run at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 640 SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7770 80 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 171 Watts
Difference: 91 Watts (114%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should be 55% faster than the Radeon HD 7770 overall, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7770 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 39888 (55%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should be a bit (approximately 4%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 7770. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7770 40000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 1472 (4%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm is a better choice, though only just barely. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7770 16000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 128 (1%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 7770

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm Radeon HD 7770
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year December 22, 2008 February 2012
Code Name G200b Cape Verde XT
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts 80 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 40000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 16000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 640
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1500 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 7770

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon HD 7770”
AJUTOR : Recomandare Placa Video says:

[...] o sursa buna, si nu mereu ce e nou e si bun. Da 650 TI e peste HD 7770, dar HD 7770 e sub GTX 260. GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon HD 7770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware C... " -Domnu', domnu', veniti aici. Luati, au talpa noua. -Si dumneavoastra? -Eu maine ma [...]

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield