Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon HD 7770

Intro

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti uses a 40 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 900 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a speed of 1026 MHz on this specific model. It features 192 SPUs as well as 32 TAUs and 24 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 7770, which comes with GPU clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 640 SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7770 80 Watts
GeForce GTX 550 Ti 116 Watts
Difference: 36 Watts (45%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti should be a lot faster than the Radeon HD 7770 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 550 Ti 98496 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7770 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 26496 (37%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 7770 will be a lot (about 39%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 550 Ti. (explain)

Radeon HD 7770 40000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 550 Ti 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 11200 (39%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti will be quite a bit (more or less 35%) better at FSAA than the Radeon HD 7770, and will be able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 550 Ti 21600 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7770 16000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 5600 (35%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 7770

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 550 Ti Radeon HD 7770
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 2011 February 2012
Code Name GF116 Cape Verde XT
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 2.1 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 1000 MHz
Shader Speed 1800 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1026 MHz (4104 MHz effective) 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 192 640
Texture Mapping Units 32 40
Render Output Units 24 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 192-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 116 watts 80 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 98496 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 40000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 21600 Mpixels/sec 16000 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

8 Responses to “GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon HD 7770”
jony says:
i am a IT professional, personally i am a sales person in computer company, to convince my customer i all ways visit this side to make there right choice.
Loren says:
Sometimes this site passes wrong information that very harmful for everyone :(
mrhiab says:
Hey Joni...you might be AN IT Professional. However your desecration of the English language is astonishing.
[...] ddr5 192bit hdmi - Graphic Cards - Components nya icompare nmo sa 7770 na card basihi lng ani.. GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon HD 7770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare ako card sauna is the gtx550Ti ako screen resulotion is 1620x1050 pru ang recommnded sa card na [...]
[...] use these ati things and they loss performance with every new game besid compare 550ti with 7770 : GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon HD 7770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare nvida 11000/rs cost card can defeat single handed ati 13.7k card 550ti price Graphic Cards - [...]
Anonymous says:
[...] no me hagais sentir mal x la compra de la gtx550 k la asus hd7770 ya no estaba xD GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon HD 7770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare que es el texel rate? xD segun e leido es algo de cantidad de pixeles en 3d o algo asi no me [...]
[...] at you but I'd think a little bit before you try to show me up. I built that build to be cheap. GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon HD 7770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare The GTX 550 TI is theoretically better. But since you would like to go the AMD video card, for the [...]
Anonymous says:
This site is fake.

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree